If All Marketers Were Geniuses, Digital Marketing Would Be Easier…

Josh Shatkin-Margolis, CEO of Magnetic, recently interviewed me for an iMedia series called All Marketers Are Geniuses.  (Perhaps he was looking to disprove that hypothesis…. ) Thanks Josh for the fun interview. I’ve posted it below, and it’s also here.

The area that has been most on my mind is reflected below in response to the question “how is online marketing falling short?”  It’s pretty clear that we, as an industry, have gotten so stuck on getting more, faster, and better data that we too often forget to focus on and stick to the problems we are trying to solve.  More below…

All Marketers Are Geniuses: How to Leverage (and Streamline) Data for Marketing Success

Posted by Josh Shatkin-Margolis on July 13th, 2011 at 9:23 am

The first installment of “All Marketers Are Geniuses” features Harrison Magun, SVP of Paid Media & Analytics at Covario. Magun leads Covario’s team focused on service and software solutions, as well as analytics, for paid search, display advertising, video ads and paid social media.

When did you realize you wanted to be a marketer?

My focus in graduate school was not on marketing; it was on international business and finance. My first job out of grad school was at American Express, working on a team tasked with building out and monetizing a fleet of ATMs. As part of my role, I experimented with how to drive increased transactions and revenue, including adding bank and network logos to signage, advertising relevant ATM-dispensed coupons and increasing the size of the enclosure. I found that even small changes to the appearance of the ATM could double or triple the number of transactions and the volume of revenue. Ultimately, it was the cool blend of creative marketing and the science of analytics that sold me on the career I have now.

Complete this sentence: Marketers are geniuses because….

We tend to leverage metrics and data, all of which point to the fact that 94.5% of marketers are geniuses. Just ask one.

If I weren’t a marketer, I would be…

Probably a scientist or a physician. Sick people everywhere should be very happy I did not pursue this path.

Where do you think marketers will be spending the largest amount of time, effort and money reaching out to their customers over the next ten years — TV, print, digital, SEM or display advertising?

A few macro trends are at work here. Dollars follow eyeballs online. IAB reported a 23% year-over-year increase in online spending for the first quarter. We are experiencing the continuing trend of consumers wanting to live online, not just transact online. Another significant trend within digital marketing revenue growth is the increase in display advertising spend, which is expected by many (including eMarketer) to eclipse search in three years. So we’ll see more digital dollars, and, specifically, more display dollars.

But, don’t think this bodes ill for search engine marketing. The technologies responsible for helping advertisers win in search are precisely the same technologies that advertisers will need to win in the new display world. Hand-vended display ads sold with a dinner and a wink is not where the growth will come. As biddable display advertising is increasingly bought and sold on exchanges, display begins to look and smell a lot like the way search campaigns are executed – very data heavy, very complicated and very analytical. People and platforms that enable this kind of execution and optimization for display will receive increased investment from advertisers, so this is another area where dollars will flow.

How has search impacted today’s digital display market?

With search we’ve created a population of analysts and a set of tools that are beginning to influence the display world, as I mentioned before. Another, more obvious influence is around search retargeting. Search retargeting gives advertisers a second chance to reach consumers who might have not been ready to transact during their search experience. Search retargeting is the gateway to display opportunities for search advertisers.

In your eMarketer interview, you mentioned that search and retargeting makes for a “one-two punch” – can you elaborate on this?

Some consumers buy right away after searching for a product or service. Some never buy. Most are somewhere in between. Retargeting, especially when combined with the right data – such as where consumers are in their consideration process and what their needs are at any given point in time – allows marketers to reach consumers with the right information at the right moment.

The best analogy I can think of is the following retail scenario. Since I am from Seattle, I’ll use REI, where I recently bought a pair of running shoes. Here is the first case: Suppose the salesperson at the front of the store just walked away after hearing me answer “No” to the question “Can I help you with anything?”

Now picture a second salesperson who sees me in the apparel department and asks “Is there anything particular in this department you are looking for?” and directs me to shoes. And then picture another salesperson in the shoe department asking me “What kind of running do you do? …oh ok, this one is on sale.”

This second case is search retargeting – finding the appropriate time and manner to help someone buy something (and help someone sell something).

Where is digital marketing falling short?

We have more data than we have ever had with search data, Web analytics data, ad server data, social data, CRM data, etc. And we have more levers to pull as marketers – it’s not just search and display anymore. As an industry, we seem to think that we can cram all of this stuff on a dashboard. If we did this kind of dashboard-cramming in today’s cars, my Subaru would look like the cockpit of a 747. We need to get better at understanding what marketing problems are solvable, which ones we want to solve (and in what order), and what data we don’t need. The industry has become so accustomed to trying to acquire more and more data that we’ve lost track of what we are trying to do with it.

Where do you think the largest opportunity exists for marketers to prove their genius?

I think we, as digital marketers, proved we are very smart by handling very complex tasks. To prove we are geniuses? Make them easier.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Technorati

An RSVP to Google’s +1 party

Thanks to Covario’s stellar PR and marketing team, Search Engine Land quoted part of the below here today.

Below is my full-yet-brief take on Google’s recent “+1″ launch and impact to marketers.

Net/net: marketers need not stress…the party has not started yet. But it could be rockin’ when it does.

Paid Search advertisers most likely  will see little or no impact from the “+1” in the short term, although the long term potential for “+1” as  an important lever could be very significant. Why we are not too concerned in the short term:

First, Google has said (in their FAQ) “[+1] does not change how we determine your ad’s relevance of quality” so advertisers need not worry about changes to relevancy. (although Matt Cutts was quoted by yesterday ““we’ll look at it as a potential signal to improve search quality” presumably in reference to organic search.

Second, the “+1” is only valuable to the extent that a logged-in Google user sees an ad that one of their Google “contacts” endorsed with a “+1.” Since Google lacks the obvious social network functionality of Facebook or Linkedin, it’s unclear how many Google users leverage Google’s ability to store contacts, via Gmail or Chat.   If users are not logged in and/or don’t have a lot of Gmail/Chat contacts, then they will only see aggregated “+1″s which ostensibly would be less impactful than  personalized recommendations.

Third: the +1 can only be accessed or seen on search ads today. Google has stated their intentions to add the “+1” button functionality to websites, similar to Facebook’s ubiquitous “Like” button.  When this happens, I would expect that usage increases significantly.

Lastly, there is no reporting yet within AdWords or Google Analytics. So even if the “+1” does impact ad performance, those performance metrics are elusive (for now.)

As Google extends this to Android devices, allows website owners to button it to their pages, and gives advertisers the data and ability to optimize, the impact of the “+1” can easily become an important lever in paid search marketing.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Technorati

Convenient Ploy to Brag about Sidney

When I was born, my parents sent telegrams to family members who were overseas at the time.

My oldest boy is 10. When he was born, we used our cell phones to call family to announce his arrival.

Our middle boy is 7. I sent emails from a coffee shop near the hospital where he was born.

Sidney, our youngest, was born yesterday. I posted on Facebook from my mobile device in the hospital room.

My heart is bursting with joy over little Sidney, and my brain is just a  bit stunned by the evolving role technology plays in our lives.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Technorati

Wet Towel on Remessaging?

“Oh, you wanted to talk to my wife, hold on let me get her for you.” [...] “Oh honey! There’s a towel banner on the internet, do you want any??”

Popularity: 1% [?]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Technorati

Will Affiliate Marketing Disappear?

Disclaimer:  I have not thought a ton about affiliate marketing in years, since we launched the practice at eonMedia in 2003 and wound it down to focus on paid search only by 2004. Recently, I was engaged in a conversation about the future of affiliate marketing.

Sony Betamax

I then did a bit of digging. I could be missing something, but I can’t see affiliate marketing, in its present state at least, becoming a growth industry. In fact, I can see how it might cease to exist completely, at least in its present form.

According to Forrester projections (passed on by affiliate marketing blog  AMnavigator) affiliate marketing continues to be a small percentage of online media spend, representing ~$2B in 2009 (in a roughly $70B global digital media industry, according to Magna).
While the value to advertisers of free acquisition is clear, it’s hard to see how affiliates can continue to secure the cheap inventory and traffic on which they rely.  Three traffic sources affiliates rely on will continue to become less available to them:

  1. Paid Search – as CPCs increase, CPC-to-CPA arbitrage will be less of an opportunity to affiliates, as large marketers continue to optimize their own websites and web marketing programs, adding to competition.
  2. SEO – Especially with Bing’s attack on Google, the search relevancy battle will continue to work in favor of major brands and authentic  sources, and SEO efforts of affiliates will continue to decline in effectiveness as Google and Bing continue to strive for relevancy.
  3. Cheap RON (run of network) display: Exchanges, DSPs, and DMP (data management platforms) will continue to allow advertisers and publishers to better optimize the kind of high volume/ low cost inventory, driving up the cost of the banners and links typically bought by affiliates to arbitrage CPM into CPA.

If that’s not enough, the increased focus advertisers have on conversion attribution, or looking beyond the last click to determine conversion credit, will only serve to take credit from the channels, such as affiliate, which rely on their ability to generate clicks which directly precede coversions, regardless of causality.

I’d love to hear from folks who have been closer to affiliate marketing than I have been…

Popularity: 1% [?]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Technorati

Google’s Hedge?

As reported in BrandRepublic on 2/3, Google  will put more muscle around a fee-based enterprise level cloud-based web analytics solution. As many of you know, Google currently attracts a lot of smaller advertisers with it’s free Google Analytics and has also continued to support the legacy Urchin advertiser-hosted software distributed through resellers.
It’s clear that with this decision, Google will address the top end of the market, currently dominated by Omniture/Adobe and CoreMetrics/IBM at the enterprise level. According to Istobe, Google does have the largest share on a percentage-of-advertisers basis; however, many of those retailers are  sub-enterprise level who choose a free option over a more robust/expensive one. READ THE FULL ARTICLE >>

Popularity: 1% [?]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Technorati

Seattle Interview #3: Jeff Bell, NCT Ventures

Seattle’s Jeff Bell is investment partner at NCT Ventures, and talks with digitalCMO about his recent investment and exit from ClearSaleing, working in a remote office, his time at Microsoft and Chrysler, digital marketing, and other fun stuff.

 This is part three of five in digitalCMO’s Seattle interview series.

digitalCMO: You are on the investment team at NCT Ventures, a VC firm. You are based in Seattle, and NCT is based in Columbus, Ohio. NCT is not well known in Seattle, can you tell me something about the firm? READ THE FULL ARTICLE >>

Popularity: 5% [?]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Technorati

Seattle Interview #2: Rand Fishkin, CEO SEOmoz

This is the second in a series of interviews with Seattle-area digital leaders. Last one was Chris Devore.

Rand founded SEOmoz in 2004 in Seattle, where he still leads the company. Only on digitalCMO can you discover:

  • How Rand thinks about  transparency, leadership, and hiring
  • Annual revenues and margins of SEOmoz.org (a privately-held co.)
  • Mean things and hard stuff
  • How crappy is www.digitalCMO.com from an organic search perspective and what can I do about it?

The interview below and the conversation around it was fun and inspiring for me – I hope you enjoy as much as I did.

digitalCMO:You’ve mentioned to me how important ‘transparency’ is to you.  Can you talk about how this shows up in your role as founder and CEO of SEOmoz? READ THE FULL ARTICLE >>

Popularity: 3% [?]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Technorati

Seattle Interview #1: Chris DeVore/ Founders Co-op

Chris DeVore co-founded Judy’s Book and currently operates Founders Co-op, a early-stage venture fund and community of entrepreneurs in the Seattle area, focused on web-based and software services.

Chris graciously agreed to share his thoughts on start-ups, capital, and innovation:

digitalCMO: What inspired you to start Founders Co-op?

Chris: In late 2007 my business partner (Andy Sack) and I sold our previous company, a venture-backed local search business called Judy’s Book.  We knew we wanted to keep working as partners but weren’t sure we wanted to go heads-down on another startup.  In late 2007 and early 2008 we helped several other entrepreneurs create new companies as non-operating co-founders, investors and board members. READ THE FULL ARTICLE >>

Popularity: 2% [?]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Technorati

Two Wacky Lists for Managers and Analysts

First List (for Managers):  25 Oddball Interview Questions, from GlassDoor. 


1. “If you were shrunk to the size of a pencil and put in a blender, how would you get out?”

Asked at Goldman Sachs.

2. “How many ridges [are there] around a quarter?” Asked at Deloitte.

3. “What is the philosophy of Martial Arts?” Asked at Aflac.

4. “Explain [to] me what has happened in this country during the last 10 years.” Asked at Boston Consulting.

5. “Rate yourself on a scale of 1 to 10 how weird you are.” Asked at Capital One. READ THE FULL ARTICLE >>

Popularity: 5% [?]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Live
  • MSN Reporter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • RSS
  • Technorati